GEAGLEY INDICTMENT UPDATE:

- PROLOGUE: New Documents, Even Deeper Questions On July 1, 2026, LCV Blotter published an open letter to Richard Cuddihy, the attorney who represented Di Ann Rae Geagley in her embezzlement case. The letter asked six questions about the mediation process, the victims' consent, the timing of the indictment, conflicts of interest, restitution, and potential cooperation. Since then, new documents have come to light that raise even deeper questions about the network of attorneys involved in the Travelland RV cover-up. Samuel Harrich and Trae Turner—two attorneys employed by Clark and Feeney who were on opposite sides of the *Moore v. Moore* divorce case—attempted to form a business together during the very same period they were opposing each other in court. Bridget Barr, formerly of Clark & Feeney, joined Cuddihy, Schumacher & Barr, PLLC—the very firm where Richard Cuddihy practices—during the period leading up to and during the Geagley indictment. Trae Turner left Clark & Feeney and started his own practice, Turner Law, PLLC, in May 2026. A citizen tipster has revealed that public records requests for documents related to these attorneys' connections to Travelland RV were met with a stunning response: "All physical records pertaining to this matter were lost in the transition to the new Nez Perce County Courthouse." 【ANONYMOUS TIP】 These new documents paint a picture of an interconnected legal network that spans firms, counties, and even states—a network that appears to have been designed to protect its own. - CHAPTER I: The Harrich-Turner Connection ### Section I.1: The Failed Partnership On July 6, 2025, Samuel P. Harrich and Trae D. Turner filed a Certificate of Organization with the Idaho Secretary of State for a new professional limited liability company: Harrich and Turner, PLLC. The filing lists: - Principal Office: 1809 OLD ORCHARDS CT, LEWISTON, ID 83501 - Registered Agent: Samuel P. Harrich - Governors: Samuel P. Harrich and Trae D. Turner - Profession: Law - Date Filed: July 6, 2025 This filing is significant because it shows that Harrich and Turner were attempting to form a business partnership during the exact same period they were opposing each other in the Moore v. Moore divorce case and while Turner was representing Justin Coleman before the Idaho State Bar Association. ### Section I.2: The Moore v. Moore Conflict Court records show that Trae Turner was representing Heather D. Moore in her divorce from Daniel Moore (Case CV35-25-1290), while Samuel Harrich was representing Daniel Moore. The timeline is striking: | Date | Event | | :--- | :--- | | July 6, 2025 | Harrich and Turner file to form a business partnership | | August 12, 2025 | Moore divorce case filed (CV35-25-1290) | | August 23, 2025 | Harrich forms Harrich Law, PLLC and Harrich Realty Holdings, LLC | | September 8, 2025 | Trae Turner files Notice of Appearance for Heather Moore | | May 2026 | Turner leaves Clark & Feeney, starts Turner Law, PLLC | The question is obvious: How could two attorneys currently or formerly employed at Clark and Feeney who were opposing each other in a contentious divorce case simultaneously be forming a business partnership? Could it be safely assumed it a brazen show of gamesmanship that was done to play both sides of the case? ### Section I.3: The Harrich Entities On August 23, 2025, just weeks after filing the Harrich and Turner partnership, Samuel Harrich dissolved that partnership and filed two additional entities with the Idaho Secretary of State: 1. Harrich Realty Holdings, LLC – a limited liability company 【B1042-3576.pdf】 2. Harrich Law, PLLC – a professional limited liability company 【B1042-3577.pdf】 Both entities list Harrich as the sole governor and registered agent. The timing suggests that Harrich was building a business empire while simultaneously litigating against his would-be partner's client. - CHAPTER II: The Cuddihy-Barr-Schumacher Connection ### Section II.1: The Firm That Represents Geagley Richard Cuddihy is the attorney who represented Di Ann Rae Geagley in her embezzlement of Travelland RV case. He practices at Cuddihy, Schumacher & Barr, PLLC, a firm located at 313 D Street, Suite 101, in Lewiston, Idaho. The firm's members include: - Richard Cuddihy – Manager - Joseph W. Schumacher – Member - Bridget D. Barr – Member ### Section II.2: Bridget Barr's History with Clark & Feeney Bridget Barr was formerly an attorney at Clark & Feeney, LLP—the same firm where Trae Turner practiced until May 2026. Bridget Barr formerly represented Travelland RV in 2021. On June 9, 2021, Bridget Barr filed a Notice of Appearance in *Cory Michael Switzer v. Travelland RV Inc.* (Asotin County District Court No. CI 018685), formally representing Travelland RV Inc. against me. The letter, written on Clark & Feeney letterhead, states: "Enclosed please find the original and one (1) copy of Motion to Dismiss and Declaration in Support and Notice of Hearing for filing in the above-referenced matter." This means that Bridget Barr was directly involved in representing Travelland RV against me in Washington State court—the same Travelland RV that would later be the victim of the $554,000 embezzlement by Di Ann Geagley. ### Section II.3: The Transition The amendment to Cuddihy's firm, filed on July 16, 2025, shows that Bridget Barr and Joseph Schumacher joined the firm at some point prior to that date. This timing is also telling, given Turners representation of Justin Coleman before the Idaho State Bar Association during this same time period. The timing is significant: - July 16, 2025 – Cuddihy, Schumacher & Barr, PLLC files amendment - September 23, 2025 – Geagley criminal complaint filed - October 2025 – Geagley indicted (previously under seal) - February 2026 – Geagley indictment made public - March 24, 2026 – Geagley pleads guilty Bridget Barr—who had previously represented Travelland RV against me—was now practicing at the same firm as Richard Cuddihy, the attorney representing the woman who embezzled $554,000 from Travelland RV. The question is obvious: Did Bridget Barr's prior representation of Travelland RV create a conflict of interest for Cuddihy's firm? - CHAPTER III: Trae Turner's Departure from Clark & Feeney ### Section III.1: The Exit On May 14, 2026, Trae Turner filed a Certificate of Assumed Business Name for Turner Law with the Idaho Secretary of State. The filing lists: - Assumed Business Name: Turner Law - Mailing Address: 828 1/2 6TH ST, CLARKSTON, WA 99403-2013 - Owner: Trae Turner, 2776 18TH STREET, CLARKSTON, WA 99403 This filing came just days after Clark & Feeney informed me that Turner was no longer with the firm. On May 4, 2026, Shila Roberts of Clark & Feeney emailed me: "Trae Turner and Mary are no longer with Clark and Feeney, LLP. They can be reached at Turner Law, PLLC." ### Section III.2: The Timing Turner's departure from Clark & Feeney came amid growing scrutiny of his conflicts of interest: - He had represented Justin Coleman before the Idaho State Bar - He had represented Heather Moore in her divorce - He had represented Travelland RV - His ex-wife, Kali Jo Parker, worked in Coleman's office - He had donated $500 to Coleman's campaign The timing also coincides with the Geagley guilty plea, which occurred on March 24, 2026, just weeks before Turner's departure. The question is obvious: Did Turner leave Clark & Feeney to distance himself from the growing scrutiny, or was he pushed out? - CHAPTER IV: The "Lost Records" Admission ### Section IV.1: The Tipster's Information On July 2, 2026, LCV Blotter received an email from [ANONYMOUS TIP], a citizen who had been following the Geagley investigation. [ANONYMOUS TIP] wrote: "Your information on Mr. Cuddihy is out of date. He is currently at the firm of Cuddihy, Schumacher, and Barr. What will blow your mind is as follows: Mr. Schumacher and Ms. Barr were both also formerly employed by Clark and Feeney. They may have been directly involved with the Travelland cover up negotiations."* ### Section IV.2: The Public Records Request [ANONYMOUS TIP] also revealed that he had submitted a public information request demanding records on these attorneys' connections to Travelland RV. The response he received was stunning: "All physical records pertaining to this matter were lost in the transition to the new Nez Perce County Courthouse." [ANONYMOUS TIP] This is a breathtaking admission. If true, it means that physical records related to the Travelland RV investigation were "lost" during a courthouse transition — an admission of guilt during the transition that conveniently occurred during the period when the investigation was active. Otherwise, it's just another boilerplate obstruction by Nez Perce County using a familial relationship between Rick Cuddihy and Stephanie Cuddihy, the person responsible for releasing those documents. If false, it means that the County is obstructing public records requests by claiming records were "lost" when they were actually being withheld. Either way, the public is being denied access to records that could explain why a $554,000 embezzlement went uninvestigated for years. The question is obvious: Were the records truly lost, or were they intentionally destroyed or withheld? - CHAPTER V: The Network's Evolution ### Section V.1: The Clark & Feeney Exodus The documents reveal a pattern of attorneys leaving Clark & Feeney and forming their own practices or joining other firms: | Attorney | Former Firm | New Firm | Date | | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | | Trae Turner | Clark & Feeney | Turner Law, PLLC | May 2026 | | Bridget Barr | Clark & Feeney | Cuddihy, Schumacher & Barr | July 2025 | | Joseph Schumacher | Clark & Feeney | Cuddihy, Schumacher & Barr | July 2025 | | Samuel Harrich | Clark & Feeney | Harrich Law, PLLC | August 2025 | | Katie Hawkings | Clark a& Feeney, Washington State Bar | ???? July 2025 | This exodus from Clark & Feeney appears to be more than coincidence. It suggests that the firm was shedding attorneys who were associated with the Travelland RV matters—or that attorneys were leaving to distance themselves from the growing scrutiny. Namely Katie Hawkins, who is a commissioner for the Washington State Bar Association. ### Section V.2: The Continuing Conflicts Despite the departures, the conflicts persist: - Cuddihy represented Geagley, who embezzled from Travelland RV - Barr previously represented Travelland RV against me - Schumacher previously worked at Clark & Feeney, which worked with Turner who represented Travelland RV - Turner represented Heather Moore, Travelland RV, and Justin Coleman - Harrich represented Daniel Moore while attempting to form a business with Turner The network has simply reconfigured itself. The players have changed firms, but the connections and loyalties remain. - CHAPTER VI: The Unanswered Questions ### Section VI.1: Questions for Richard Cuddihy 1. Did you know that Bridget Barr previously represented Travelland RV? 2. Did you know that Joseph Schumacher previously worked at Clark & Feeney? 3. Did these prior representations create any conflicts of interest in your representation of Di Ann Geagley? 4. Were you aware that Travelland RV was represented by Trae Turner, who also represented Justin Coleman? 5. Did you discuss these conflicts with your client before accepting the case? ### Section VI.2: Questions for Bridget Barr 1. Did you represent Travelland RV in Switzer v. Travelland RV Inc.? 2. Did you have any involvement in the Travelland RV embezzlement investigation? 3. Did you discuss your prior representation of Travelland RV with Richard Cuddihy before he accepted the Geagley case? 4. Did you have any knowledge of the embezzlement before it was reported? ### Section VI.3: Questions for Samuel Harrich 1. Why did you and Trae Turner attempt to form a business partnership while opposing each other in the Moore divorce? 2. Did you disclose this attempted partnership to your client, Daniel Moore? 3. Did this attempted partnership create a conflict of interest in your representation of Daniel Moore? ### Section VI.4: Questions for Trae Turner 1. Why did you and Samuel Harrich attempt to form a business partnership while opposing each other in the Moore divorce? 2. Did you disclose this attempted partnership to your client, Heather Moore? 3. Why did you leave Clark & Feeney? 4. Did your departure have anything to do with the Geagley indictment or the scrutiny of your conflicts of interest? ### Section VI.5: Questions for the Nez Perce County Clerk, Patty Weeks. 1. Were records related to the Travelland RV investigation truly "lost" during the courthouse transition? 2. What steps were taken to preserve records during the transition? 3. Were any records intentionally destroyed? 4. Are there any digital copies of the "lost" records? - CONCLUSION: The Network Adapts, But the Questions Remain The new documents reveal that the network of attorneys involved in the Travelland RV cover-up is not static. It adapts. It reconfigures. It finds new firms and new partnerships. But the questions remain the same: - Why did a $554,000 embezzlement go uninvestigated for years? - Why were whistleblowers dismissed as "delusional"? - Why did attorneys with conflicts of interest continue to represent clients in related matters? - Why were public records "lost" during a courthouse transition? The answers to these questions are not in the documents that were produced. They are in the documents that were "lost." The paper trail is incomplete. But the pattern is clear. And the questions will not go away. - TIMELINE OF EVENTS | Date | Event | | :--- | :--- | | June 9, 2021 | Bridget Barr files Motion to Dismiss in *Switzer v. Travelland RV Inc.* | | July 7, 2021 | Meghan McCreary changes name to Vittoria Puccini | | August 21, 2021 | Puccini claims total disability | | November 2021 | I report tax evasion to Idaho Tax Commission | | April 4, 2022 | Trae Turner and Kali Jo Parker donate $500 each to Justin Coleman | | April 2022 | I report embezzlement to Officer Andrew Fox; no action taken | | January 4, 2022 | Trae Turner files lawsuit against me (CV35-22-0008) | | July 6, 2025 | Harrich and Turner file to form business partnership | | July 16, 2025 | Cuddihy, Schumacher & Barr files amendment | | August 12, 2025 | Moore divorce case filed (CV35-25-1290) | | August 23, 2025 | Harrich forms Harrich Law, PLLC and Harrich Realty Holdings, LLC | | September 23, 2025 | Geagley criminal complaint filed | | October 2025 | Geagley indicted (under seal) | | February 3, 2026 | Lewiston Tribune publishes article on Geagley indictment | | March 24, 2026 | Geagley pleads guilty | | May 4, 2026 | Clark & Feeney confirms Turner has left the firm | | May 14, 2026 | Turner files Turner Law assumed business name | | June 10, 2026 | Geagley sentenced | | July 1, 2026 | LCV Blotter sends inquiry to Richard Cuddihy | | July 2, 2026 | Tipster reveals "lost records" admission | This article is a publication of LCV Blotter, an independent watchdog journalism project. All documents cited are public records and are available upon request. The investigator is visually impaired, has no income, and has spent five years documenting a pattern of corruption that crosses state lines. The cover‑up is exposed. The receipts are public. The process continues.