The Parent Who Wouldn't Stop Fighting: How One Washington Mother Lost Her Children to a System That Wouldn't Listen
A Washington mother says state records cleared her home, identified greater risks in the father's household, and documented children afraid to speak—yet she remains limited to three supervised hours
Read more →
The Troubleshooter and the System: How the Idaho State Bar Protected Its Own While Ignoring a Felony
The Idaho State Bar systematically protected a network of officials while ignoring documented evidence of misconduct, ex parte communications, conflicts of interest, and a criminal guilty plea that va
Read more →
From Academy to Felony Indictment: The Curious Case of Officer Titus Oatman
The Questions Nobody Else is Asking...
Read more →
Silencing the Whistleblower: The Havens-Moore Enterprise Strikes Again—and Fails
The Joke's on Them: How a Panicked Smear Campaign Gave Me Free Advertising and $20
Read more →
THE ASOTIN COUNTY CORRUPTION SCHEME:
How a Prosecutor, a Coroner, Several Commissioners, and a Judge Used Taxpayer Money to Hide a First Amendment Violation
Read more →
The Forged Title
How Travelland RV and Clark & Feeney used fraud to silence a whisteblower
Read more →
GEAGLEY INDICTMENT UPDATE:
New Documents Reveal Deeper Connections Between Cuddihy, Barr, Harrich, and Turner
Read more →
The AG's Illegal Advice:
How Representative Brandon Mitchell Used Raul Labrador to Silence a Whistleblower
Read more →
The Geagley Indictment and the Questions That Remain:
...An Open Letter to Defense Attorney Richard Cuddihy
Read more →
THE HAVENS AFFAIR:
Questions Surround a Commissioner's Retirement, a Mistress, and a Network of Conflicts
Read more →
The City of Lewiston Cover-up
...a deep dive into the documents that prove a circular loop of corruption.
Read more →
The $8,733.12 Price Tag of Silence: Hannah Liedkie’s Self-Dealing, Threats, and Obstruction Exposed
...and the quid pro quo protection agreement with Justin Coleman
Read more →
Nez Perce County Prosecutor Justin Coleman's "Travelland RV Problem"
... and Coleman's obstruction of justice for the sake of family
Read more →
charlie-smirk
August 5, 2026
fluck-fock
July 30, 2026
The Troubleshooter and the System: How the Idaho State Bar Protected Its Own While Ignoring a Felony
Patty Weeks, Idaho State Bar, 11-17-2025
July 30, 2026
The Troubleshooter and the System: How the Idaho State Bar Protected Its Own While Ignoring a Felony
April Smith (Wesenburg), Idaho State Bar,
July 30, 2026
From Academy to Felony Indictment: The Curious Case of Officer Titus Oatman
NPC Tribal Police
July 27, 2026
From Academy to Felony Indictment: The Curious Case of Officer Titus Oatman
Criminal Charging Information
July 27, 2026
buy-me-brunch
July 19, 2026
-1
July 17, 2026
fuck-your-government-id
July 11, 2026
coming-soon-a-county-commissioner-a-county-pro
July 10, 2026
GEAGLEY INDICTMENT UPDATE:
Stephanie Cuddihy, Response to PRA request, email between Turner and Coleman
July 6, 2026
happy-4th-of-july
July 4, 2026
guns-don-t-kill-people-the-government-kills-peop
July 1, 2026
rightfully-so
July 1, 2026
keep-us-posted
June 28, 2026
war-pigs
June 28, 2026
The City of Lewiston Cover-up
June 27, 2026
The City of Lewiston Cover-up
June 27, 2026
brawndo-ftw
June 23, 2026
if-i-was-mugged-i-would-just-call-a-cab
June 18, 2026
Mr. "The Gimp" Turner
June 15, 2026

Thanks -
Re: Takedown Notice / Legal Threat Regarding Anonymous Post
To Whom It May Concern:
This letter is in response to your recent communication demanding removal of content posted on LCV Blotter by an anonymous user. I take this matter seriously and have reviewed the relevant facts and law.
1. Third-Party Content Under Section 230
LCV Blotter is an interactive website that allows users to post content. The content at issue was posted by an anonymous third party. Under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act (47 U.S.C. § 230), I am immune from liability for content posted by users. I am not the "publisher" or "speaker" of the content. I cannot and will not adjudicate the truthfulness of user-generated content.
2. Anonymous Speech Is Protected
The First Amendment protects anonymous speech. The United States Supreme Court has repeatedly affirmed this right. I will not disclose the identity of the anonymous user unless compelled by a court order after a proper showing. Even under such an order, I do not maintain such logs beyond a user generated receipt via "Anonymous Press Pass".
3. Defamation Requires Proof of Falsity
If you believe the content is defamatory, you must provide specific evidence of falsity. Vague allegations of defamation are insufficient. You must also show the content identifies you and makes a false statement of fact, not opinion.
4. Removal Requires a Court Order
I will not remove the content unless and until I receive a court order or valid subpoena requiring removal. I will preserve all records related to this matter, including the original post, its metadata, and all correspondence regarding this dispute.
5. Anti-SLAPP Protections
Any lawsuit filed against me for publishing user-generated content on a matter of public concern would be subject to dismissal under Washington's anti-SLAPP statute (RCW 4.24.510) and/or North Carolina's anti-SLAPP statute (N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1-538.3). I reserve all rights to recover attorney's fees and costs in the event of such a lawsuit.
6. Preservation Obligations
This letter serves as notice that you are obligated to preserve all evidence related to this matter, including:
- Any communications you have had with the anonymous user;
- Any evidence supporting your claim of falsity;
- Any records of communications with other parties regarding this matter.
I am not in a position to determine the truthfulness of the allegation. If you believe the allegation is false, your remedy is against the author of the statement, not against the platform.
Nothing in this letter should be construed as a waiver of any rights or defenses.
Sincerely,
Corey Michael Switzer
LCV Blotter
Re: Takedown Notice / Legal Threat Regarding Anonymous Post
To Whom It May Concern:
This letter is in response to your recent communication demanding removal of content posted on LCV Blotter by an anonymous user. I take this matter seriously and have reviewed the relevant facts and law.
1. Third-Party Content Under Section 230
LCV Blotter is an interactive website that allows users to post content. The content at issue was posted by an anonymous third party. Under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act (47 U.S.C. § 230), I am immune from liability for content posted by users. I am not the "publisher" or "speaker" of the content. I cannot and will not adjudicate the truthfulness of user-generated content.
2. Anonymous Speech Is Protected
The First Amendment protects anonymous speech. The United States Supreme Court has repeatedly affirmed this right. I will not disclose the identity of the anonymous user unless compelled by a court order after a proper showing. Even under such an order, I do not maintain such logs beyond a user generated receipt via "Anonymous Press Pass".
3. Defamation Requires Proof of Falsity
If you believe the content is defamatory, you must provide specific evidence of falsity. Vague allegations of defamation are insufficient. You must also show the content identifies you and makes a false statement of fact, not opinion.
4. Removal Requires a Court Order
I will not remove the content unless and until I receive a court order or valid subpoena requiring removal. I will preserve all records related to this matter, including the original post, its metadata, and all correspondence regarding this dispute.
5. Anti-SLAPP Protections
Any lawsuit filed against me for publishing user-generated content on a matter of public concern would be subject to dismissal under Washington's anti-SLAPP statute (RCW 4.24.510) and/or North Carolina's anti-SLAPP statute (N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1-538.3). I reserve all rights to recover attorney's fees and costs in the event of such a lawsuit.
6. Preservation Obligations
This letter serves as notice that you are obligated to preserve all evidence related to this matter, including:
- Any communications you have had with the anonymous user;
- Any evidence supporting your claim of falsity;
- Any records of communications with other parties regarding this matter.
I am not in a position to determine the truthfulness of the allegation. If you believe the allegation is false, your remedy is against the author of the statement, not against the platform.
Nothing in this letter should be construed as a waiver of any rights or defenses.
Sincerely,
Corey Michael Switzer
LCV Blotter